Connecticut Sweepstakes Laws: The Criminal Code, at Misdemeanour Level
Connecticut sweepstakes laws are where the question stops being a civil-penalty exercise and becomes a criminal one.
| Statute | SB 1235 (Public Act 25-112) |
|---|---|
| Signed | 2025 |
| Effective | In force |
| Exposure | A violation carries the penalty for professional gambling under §53-278b(b), a class A misdemeanour, and is also an unfair or deceptive trade practice under §42-110b |
| Enforcement | Department of Consumer Protection / Gaming Division |
| Status | ban |
| What defines it | Professional-gambling penalty (class A misdemeanour) plus unfair trade practice |
| Last verified | 2026-09-13 |
The distinction that matters
Most ban states reached for civil penalties — six figures per violation, painful and survivable. Connecticut reached for the criminal code. Public Act 25-112 makes a sweepstakes that “allows or facilitates participation in any real or simulated online casino gaming or sports wagering” by an unlicensed person subject to “the penalty for professional gambling, as provided in subsection (b) of section 53-278b” — and that subsection says a professional gambler “shall be guilty of a class A misdemeanor.” It is a criminal penalty that attaches to people, not only a fine on a company, and the Act separately makes the same conduct an unfair trade practice.
Connecticut had a motive the others lacked at the time. It runs a tightly-held regulated iGaming market through two tribal operators and the state lottery. A dual-currency competitor is not a grey-market nuisance there — it is unlicensed competition against a state revenue stream.
Practical effect on operators
Every major dual-currency brand had exited Connecticut before the end of summer 2025. Enforcement was not absent: in 2025 the Department of Consumer Protection announced a settlement with High5Games, whose licence it had summarily suspended in March 2025 over an unlicensed sweepstakes casino. Several trade reports described Connecticut’s penalty as a felony; the Act’s text does not.
Criminal exposure changes exit timing more reliably than any fine schedule.
Can you still play a sweepstakes casino in Connecticut?
Public Act 25-112 amended Connecticut’s sweepstakes statute to bar a sweepstakes or promotional drawing that allows or facilitates participation in real or simulated online casino gaming by anyone not licensed under Connecticut’s gaming law. A violation carries the penalty for professional gambling, a class A misdemeanour, and is also an unfair or deceptive trade practice. Connecticut licenses its own online casino operators, and an unlicensed sweepstakes casino offering casino-style play to Connecticut players is the conduct the amendment names.
A site being reachable from Connecticut is not evidence that it is lawful there.
Sources
- Verified Connecticut General Assembly, Public Act 25-112 (Substitute SB 1235), Sec. 14 amending §42-301, and §53-278b — read 13 September 2026. Approved by the Governor 24 June 2025 per the bill status record. The online §42-301 page still shows the pre-2025 text; the Public Act is the amended version.
- Probable Nelson Mullins, “Game Over? States Mull Sweepstakes Casino Bans” (July 2025). Law-firm commentary, not primary text; relabelled 8 September 2026.
- Unverified Sweepsy operator-exit tracker: Zula restricts Connecticut, 1 August 2025. Commercial aggregator, which this tracker does not treat as a source of fact (DECISIONS 77); kept only as the record of where the claim came from. Relabelled 8 September 2026.
Flickloot carries no affiliate links and takes no operator money.