US sweepstakes law tracker

Twenty-eight states, tracked against primary bill text and enforcement announcements. Updated in the same week any status changes. Last updated 24 September 2026.

State Status Authority In force What defines it
Montana Ban SB 555 1 Oct 2025 Online casinos written into internet gambling; three cumulative conditions
Connecticut Ban SB 1235 / PA 25-112 2025 Professional-gambling penalty (class A misdemeanour) plus unfair trade practice
New Jersey Ban A5447 15 Aug 2025 $100k–$250k reported; a $20 limit on merchandise a participant buys, not on prizes won
New York Ban S5935A / §912 5 Dec 2025 Reaches processors and affiliates; excludes no-prize games
California Ban AB 831 1 Jan 2026 Supply-chain criminal liability
Indiana Ban HB 1052 1 Jul 2026 $100k per violation; four-limb definition in an omnibus act
Tennessee Ban SB 2136 22 May 2026 Consumer Protection Act enforcement
Maine Ban LD 2007 ~14 Jul 2026 Dual-currency test; consideration includes bonus or promotional tokens
North Carolina Ban § 14-306.4 2010 Video sweepstakes banned whether entry is paid or free; no ruling yet on play on a player’s own device
Nevada Enforcement SB 256 / NRS 463 2025 No sweeps-specific ban; NRS 463 already covers it
Washington Enforcement Kater / RCW 9.46 2018 Virtual chips are a thing of value; Big Fish paid $155M
West Virginia Enforcement §61-10-5 2025–26 ~50 AG subpoenas and 20+ platform exits reported (trade press)
Louisiana Enforcement HB 53 / LGCB 2025–26 40+ C&Ds; $44M suit; racketeering exposure
Pennsylvania Enforcement PGCB / 18 Pa.C.S. § 5513 2025 18 cease-and-desist letters reported (trade press); no ban bill introduced
Kentucky Open KRS 528.010 15 Jul 2026 Sweepstakes entry is consideration — but only for a device in a business establishment; online unsettled
Arizona Enforcement ADG orders / A.R.S. § 13-3303 2025 The Department of Gaming has issued cease-and-desist orders naming sweepstakes operators

States with no ban in force that have their own page: Texas, Ohio, Georgia and Mississippi.

The filing register, which is not the ban map

Separate from every ban above: three states require a prize-promotion registration regardless of any sweepstakes-casino question. New York (§369-e, over $5,000, 30 days notice), Florida (§849.094, over $5,000, seven days), and Rhode Island (§11-50-1, over $500 — the lowest threshold in the country, and the only one with no deadline). An operator can be outside every ban on this map and still owe one of these filings.

The bills are the smaller half of the map

An operator tracking legislative calendars alone would have logged West Virginia, Michigan, Minnesota and Illinois as open markets through 2026. All four are closed. Attorneys general and gaming boards have removed more market than legislatures have, using consumer-protection statutes and gambling definitions that predate the sweepstakes model by decades — and they do it without a hearing, a vote, or a line in a bill tracker.

The visible half moves slowly and announces itself. The other half arrives as a subpoena.

What every one of these statutes has in common

Each of the eight bans enacted since 2025 turns on redeemable value. Montana attaches liability to monetary-equivalent payouts. New Jersey defines the sweepstakes by the exchange of currency for a prize. New York’s Section 912 defines the banned game by three things that must all be present: it is online, it runs a dual-currency system of payment exchangeable for cash, and it simulates casino-style gaming. Maine’s Chapter 38 uses the same shape but defines its currency element more broadly, and how far it reaches a non-redeemable model is unsettled. Nevada does not regulate social games where no prizes are awarded.

Remove redemption and the element the statutes were drafted to catch is not present. That is not a loophole — it is the distinction the legislatures themselves drew, repeatedly, in public, in the text.

Washington is the exception, and it is the constraint that governs everything else. Under Kater, a virtual chip that cannot be redeemed for anything is still a thing of value if the player bought it. Big Fish paid $155 million for that reading. The sale is the trigger — which is why nothing on this platform is ever sold.

Movement expected

Oklahoma SB 1589 takes effect in November 2026 — enacted over a veto, with supply-chain reach. Maryland’s HB 1226 / HB 295 passed the House and died in the Senate when the session ended in April 2026 — next realistic shot is the January 2027 refile window. Virginia, Florida, Massachusetts and Mississippi failed in 2026 and will refile. New Jersey’s S1500 would license the model rather than ban it, and sits in the committee where its identical 2025 predecessor died.

How this tracker is maintained. Every entry is sourced to bill text, a chapter law, a regulator’s own announcement, or a filed pleading. Trade-press claims are labelled Probable until confirmed against a primary source. Where a figure cannot be confirmed, it is labelled and the reader is told to check. The method is set out at /methodology.
Next: The Readiness Framework — what a compliant operation looks like against this map. · For operators

Last updated: 24 September 2026. Compliance reference, not legal advice.