Sweepstakes Casinos in Virginia: The Free-Entry Defence Is Already Written Out of the Code
Most states that reach sweepstakes casinos do it with a new bill. Virginia has a pending one, and it does not need it to make the argument: the definition of illegal gambling already says a purchase made in exchange for a chance to win counts as a wager “regardless of whether the chance to win … may be offered in the absence of a purchase.” That sentence is the free-entry defence, named and refused. What it still requires is a purchase.
| Statute in force | Va. Code § 18.2-325(1) — definition of “illegal gambling” |
|---|---|
| What the deeming clause reaches | A purchase of a product, Internet access, or other thing made in exchange for a chance to win, played on a device under § 18.2-325(3)(b) |
| Free-entry alternative | Expressly does not save it — the clause applies regardless of whether the chance is also offered without purchase |
| The predicate | A purchase. The clause deems a purchase to be a wager; it does not deem anything else to be one |
| Device carve-out | A machine returning “nothing more than additional chances or the right to use such machine” is not returning something of value |
| Pending bill | SB 579 (2026), patron Bryce E. Reeves — would name online sweepstakes games and add a civil penalty of $10,000–$100,000 per violation |
| Enforcement found | None documented against an online sweepstakes operator under this clause |
| Code currency | Read from the Commonwealth’s own site on 10 September 2026; last amended 2023, Sp. Sess. I, c. 1 |
| Status | open |
| What defines it | SB 579 continued to 2027 in Senate Courts of Justice, 14-1 |
| Watch | Carried over to the 2027 session – not refiled, still live |
| Last verified | 2026-08-28 |
The clause that answers the free-entry argument
Section 18.2-325(1) defines illegal gambling as a bet or wager of money or other consideration for a chance to win, on an outcome that is uncertain or a matter of chance. Then it adds a deeming sentence, and the deeming sentence is the whole point: a bet or wager “shall include the purchase of a product, Internet access, or other thing made in exchange for a chance to win a prize, stake, or other consideration or thing of value by means of the operation of a gambling device as described in subdivision 3 b, regardless of whether the chance to win such prize, stake, or other consideration or thing of value may be offered in the absence of a purchase.”
Read the last clause on its own. The alternative method of entry — the free postcard, the no-purchase-necessary route, the free daily coins — is the load-bearing element of the sweepstakes model, and Virginia’s legislature wrote it out of the defence in advance. Georgia did something similar with “even if others can participate or play for free.” Virginia’s phrasing is the more direct of the two, because it addresses the same player rather than a different one.
This is a reading of statutory text, not a legal conclusion. We found no Virginia court decision applying the deeming clause to an online sweepstakes casino, and we do not assert how one would come out.
What the clause still needs, and it is a purchase
The deeming sentence expands what counts as a wager. It does not remove the requirement that there be one. Every route into it runs through a purchase: of a product, of Internet access, or of some other thing, made in exchange for a chance to win. Strip the purchase out and the sentence has nothing to operate on, because what it deems to be a wager is the purchase itself.
So the clause defeats a free route offered alongside a paid one. That is the standard sweepstakes structure and it is plainly the target. It does not, on its text, reach a system in which no purchase of any kind is possible at any point. The distinction is between a free alternative and no paid alternative, and as far as we can find no Virginia court has been asked to draw it.
The second reason, which sits in the device definition
The deeming clause only bites on a device described in subdivision 3(b), and that subdivision carries a proviso of its own. A machine is caught when, depending on elements of chance, “it may eject something of value or determine the prize or other thing of value to which the player is entitled” — “provided, however, that the return to the user of nothing more than additional chances or the right to use such machine is not deemed something of value within the meaning of this subsection.”
A machine whose only output is more play is, by the subsection’s own words, not returning something of value. That is a second and independent reason the definition does not reach a system with no purchase and no exit: the first failure is the missing purchase, the second is the missing thing of value.
SB 579, and why being continued is not the same as being dead
SB 579 of the 2026 regular session, prefiled 14 January 2026 by Bryce E. Reeves, would add the operating, conducting or promoting of any online sweepstakes game — and supporting or assisting in it — to the definition of illegal gambling, with a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 per violation. On 11 February 2026 the Senate Courts of Justice committee continued it to 2027 by 14 to 1, after offering a substitute. Its status on the Commonwealth’s own system reads Continued. It was not defeated and it has not been refiled; it is carried.
The bill’s definition of an online sweepstakes game has three limbs and they are cumulative. The game must be available on the internet and reachable on a phone or computer; it must use “a dual currency system of payment allowing the player to exchange the currency for any prize, award, cash, or cash equivalent”; and it must simulate casino-style gaming.
The middle limb is the one worth reading twice, because it is where most sweepstakes-casino bills in other states are vaguer. As introduced, SB 579 does not reach a dual currency that cannot be exchanged for anything. It reaches one that can. The committee substitute offered on 11 February 2026, which we have now read, would have dropped the ban and that limb entirely and replaced the bill with a direction to the Virginia Lottery Board to convene a work group to study online sweepstakes games and report by 1 December 2026. The Commonwealth’s own history does not record the substitute being adopted: the same day, the committee continued the bill to 2027. On our reading, the text as introduced, dual-currency limb included, is still the live version, and a 2027 bill can be amended into a different instrument entirely.
Can you still play a sweepstakes casino in Virginia?
No Virginia statute bans sweepstakes casinos by name today, and SB 579, which would have come closest, sits continued to 2027. But Virginia’s existing definition of illegal gambling is drafted straight at the argument these operators make, and it says in terms that offering a free route does not rescue a paid one. Any model in which money is paid — for coins, for a product, for Internet access, for anything carrying a chance to win — meets that clause head-on, and a $10,000 to $100,000 civil penalty is waiting in a bill that has not gone away.
A site being reachable from Virginia is not evidence that it is lawful there. That is true everywhere, and it is worth saying in the state whose code anticipated the defence.
Sources
- Verified Commonwealth of Virginia, Legislative Information System, Va. Code § 18.2-325, Definitions — read in full 10 September 2026 from the Commonwealth’s own site, which stamped the page 9/10/2026. The deeming clause, the “regardless of whether … in the absence of a purchase” language and the subdivision 3(b) proviso are quoted from that text. Amendment history ends at 2023, Sp. Sess. I, c. 1.
- Verified Commonwealth of Virginia, Legislative Information System, SB 579, 2026 Regular Session — read 10 September 2026. Status Continued; patron Bryce E. Reeves; prefiled and ordered printed 14 January 2026; referred to Senate Courts of Justice the same day; committee substitute offered and the bill continued to 2027 on 11 February 2026 by 14-Y 1-N. The three-limb definition and the $10,000–$100,000 civil penalty are taken from the summary as introduced.
- Verified Commonwealth of Virginia, SB 579, Senate Courts of Justice amendment in the nature of a substitute, offered for consideration 11 February 2026 — read 23 September 2026. It directs a Virginia Lottery Board work group to study interactive online sweepstakes games and report by 1 December 2026. The bill’s history, re-read 24 September 2026, shows it offered and the bill continued to 2027 the same day, with no adoption recorded.
- Unverified Which session added the “in the absence of a purchase” deeming language to § 18.2-325. The section carries chapters from 1975 to 2023 and we did not trace the clause to one of them.
- Unverified Any Virginia enforcement action or court decision applying the deeming clause, or subdivision 3(b), to an online sweepstakes operator. We found none.
Flickloot carries no affiliate links and takes no operator money.